United States 2026 · Every advertiser
Parks PAC
This page ran 26 paid political ads on Facebook and Instagram between 22 October 2026 and 27 October 2026. Meta reports $19.9–25.7K of spend, which makes it the 2,377th largest advertiser of the 24,034 pages in our data. Advertiser type: Group or campaign. Most of its spend was on the Democrats’ side. Race: Federal.
Data from the Meta Ad Library, pulled 4 November 2026. Election on 3 November 2026. · Every ad of this page in Meta’s Ad Library ↗
On the FEC record
PARKSPAC, a super PAC (independent expenditures only). FEC committee C00914234 ↗
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC through 1 November 2026: $80K supporting Democrats or opposing Republicans in a general election, $0 supporting Republicans or opposing Democrats in a general election. The side above follows this record, not the wording of the ads: at least 90% of the dollars it placed for or against a party’s candidates went one way.
26
ads
$22.8K
reported spend, range $19.9–25.7K
84%
of spend on federal races
$600
median spend per ad
Meta and Google side by side
On MetaFacebook · Instagram
$22.8K
26 ads on 1 page, midpoint of Meta’s ranges, 4 May 2026 to 31 October 2026
- Largest page
- Parks PAC · $22.8K
- Federal races
- 84%
- Median spend per ad
- $600
- Attack ads, of text ads
- 81%
On Google and YouTubeSearch · YouTube · Display
$13.1–15.3K
10 ads from 1 verified advertiser account, Google’s ranges, 4 May 2026 to 4 November 2026
- Against Meta spend
- 0.6×
- Formats
- 3 video · 7 text
- Impressions
- 724K–856K
- Targeting declared
- no age or gender
- States named
- Texas, Montana, North Carolina
- Last ad shown
- 4 Nov
Google advertiser accounts
| Advertiser | Ads | Formats | States | First ad | Last ad | Spend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARKSPAC | 10 | 3 video · 7 text | TX, MT, NC | 18 Oct | 4 Nov | $13.1–15.3K |
Google publishes no ad text; the link on each account opens its ads in Google’s Ads Transparency Center. An account is tied to this page by its FEC committee; a party page lists its 1 largest.
Spend by week the ad started
Tone
Share of the 26 ads with text that our model classified. Attack ads name an opponent.
Most attacked
- Trump administration$3K
- The Trump administration$2.9K
- David Valadao$2.7K
- Juan Ciscomani$2.7K
- the Trump administration and Congress$1.9K
- Brandon Herrera$1.8K
Targets as the ads name them, by spend; the spellings of Donald Trump are counted together, other names as written.
Topics
Spend by race: Federal 84%, State 15%, No specific race 1.3%.
Spend by ad language: English 88%, Spanish 12%.
The costliest ads
The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.
Our national parks, from Sequoia to Kings Canyon, provide major economic benefits like local jobs and tourism dollars to the San Joaquin Valley's economy. Keeping parks staffed and maintained helps lift up our whole community. So when the Trump administration unleashed DOGE on the National Parks Service, eliminating jobs in California, defunding our parks and offering up public land to developers, what do we get from Congressman David Valadao? Silence. Valadao’s record is clear. A vote to kee
23 October 2026 · Parks PAC · $2.5–3K · 700K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Cuando necesitábamos a alguien que luchara por nosotros en el Congreso, Juan Ciscomani nos falló una y otra vez. Ciscomani tiene la costumbre de decir una cosa a los votantes y otra muy distinta a sus donantes. No se deje engañar por sus anuncios de campaña: los hechos hablan por sí solos. Juan Ciscomani apoyó el proyecto DOGE, que permitió a Elon Musk despedir a personal en parques de todo Arizona, incluido el Parque Nacional Saguaro, uno de los más visitados de su distrito. Cuando los votant
23 October 2026 · Parks PAC · $2.5–3K · 500K+ impressions · Attack · Ad LibrarySpanish
Washington wants to put more data centers on Arizona land at your expense. The Trump administration, behind closed doors, is pushing for four new data centers on more than 3,000 acres of Arizona’s public land. And questions are going unanswered. We don’t know where these data centers would be located, how much water these centers would consume, or what public parks would be at risk. Arizona needs a fighter in Congress who will protect our parks from destruction and data centers now. That fight
23 October 2026 · Parks PAC · $2–2.5K · 400K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Sam Forstag will do whatever it takes to protect Montana’s natural beauty. How do we know? Because he’s been risking his life for nearly a decade as a Forest Service smokejumper and wildland jumper. Sam will keep our national parks and forests fully staffed, funded, and protected from drilling, strip mining, and overdevelopment – because he’s seen up close what happens when we take them for granted. Let’s keep our parks thriving. Vote Sam Forstag for Congress in Montana’s First District b
23 October 2026 · Parks PAC · $1.5–2K · 300K+ impressions · Promotional · Ad Library
We are witnessing our sacred national parks being offered up to the highest bidder, after the Trump administration gutted funding and cut jobs at our National Parks while Congress did nothing. Now the quality of life we enjoy in the San Joaquin Valley is under constant threat from polluters and developers. We need leadership who will fight back for California parks. That fighter is Randy Villegas Randy Villegas understands how critical our parks are to the local economy and environment. He wi
23 October 2026 · Parks PAC · $1.5–2K · 350K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Washington’s plan for Texas national parks? Tear them up. Sell them off. 💣🚜💰 Southwest Texas relies on our parks for jobs, business, and everyday living. Big Bend National Park brings in $56 million to the region alone. But with virtually no public notice or approval, the Trump administration let bulldozers into Big Bend — and Congress did nothing to stop them. Texans need a fighter in Congress who will protect our parks from destruction, data centers, and overdevelopment now. That fighter
22 October 2026 · Parks PAC · $1.5–2K · 400K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Figures cover domestic political ads paid in dollars, from 4 May 2026. Spend is the sum of Meta’s range midpoints; impressions above one million are reported as “1M+”, so impression figures are floors. Each ad counts in the week its delivery started, with its lifetime spend at our last pull; ads still running before the vote are counted as of 31 October 2026.
Back to the United States report, both parties and every candidate or every advertiser.