National Right To Work

Meta and Google side by side

Google advertiser accounts

The costliest ads

The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.

• Michigan workers lost a protection against compulsory union payments. Jocelyn Benson opposes restoring it. Before repeal, Michigan’s Right to Work law protected workers from being required to pay a union as a condition of employment. Now unions and employers can again negotiate contracts requiring covered private-sector employees to pay union dues or service fees to keep their jobs. The question is whether Michigan will give those workers their choice back. A worker should be free to decide

  19 October 2026 · National Right To Work · $5–6K · 300K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• David Crowley supports repealing Wisconsin’s Right to Work law—a protection that keeps union officials from making workers pay them as a condition of employment. That should concern anyone who believes a worker’s paycheck belongs to the person who earned it. Wisconsin’s law protects the freedom to support a union voluntarily. It also protects the freedom to refuse. Repeal would allow compulsory union-payment requirements to return through contracts covering private-sector workers. A worker

  19 October 2026 · National Right To Work · $4–4.5K · 250K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• For more than 70 years, Nevada workers have had a protection worth defending: they cannot be forced to pay a union just to keep their jobs. Aaron Ford says he would sign legislation taking that protection away. Ford supports repealing Nevada’s Right to Work law. Repeal would let unions and employers negotiate contracts requiring private-sector workers covered by those agreements to pay union dues or fees—even when they do not want to support the union. Think about the power that gives union

  19 October 2026 · National Right To Work · $1.5–2K · 125K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• No worker should have to choose between paying a union and keeping a job. New Hampshire should put that protection into law. Cinde Warmington opposes doing so. Without a Right to Work law, private-sector workers covered by compulsory-fee contracts can be required to pay union officials as a condition of keeping their jobs—even when they do not want to support the union. Passing Right to Work would prohibit those compulsory payments. Workers could support a union because they believe it deserv

  19 October 2026 · National Right To Work · $1–1.5K · 50K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• Before Dan Osborn asks for your support, there’s a question that deserves an answer: should any American have to pay a union boss just to keep a job? The PRO Act would override state Right to Work protections and allow union contracts to require covered workers to pay union fees as a condition of employment -- even when those workers do not want to support the union. For a worker trying to provide for a family, that means money handed over because refusing could put a job at risk. Union offici

  19 October 2026 · National Right To Work · $800 – $899 · 45K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• Before Josh Turek asks for your support, there’s a question that deserves an answer: should any American have to pay a union boss just to keep a job? The PRO Act would override state Right to Work protections and allow union contracts to require covered workers to pay union fees as a condition of employment -- even when those workers do not want to support the union. For a worker trying to provide for a family, that means money handed over because refusing could put a job at risk. Union offici

  19 October 2026 · National Right To Work · $800 – $899 · 50K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library