Prairie Protection Colorado

The costliest ads

The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.

• 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐍𝐎 𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝟖𝟑. On November 3, Colorado voters will see an amendment that would put a constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife “𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐬” into the state constitution. “Traditional methods” is not defined anywhere in the ballot language. Proponents kept that phrase vague. That is the problem. Colorado voters already banned steel-jawed leghold traps, body-crushing traps, snares, and poisons on public land in 1996. In

  11 October 2026 · Prairie Protection Colorado · $200 – $299 · 30K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• 302 is short. Colorado could be stuck with it for generations. The final text is only one page, but it would add a new section to the Colorado Constitution. It does not expire. If voters put it in, it stays there unless voters change the Constitution again later. Hunting and fishing are already legal in Colorado. State law already says, “The state shall utilize hunting, trapping, and fishing as the primary methods of effecting necessary wildlife harvests.” So 302 is not making hunting legal.

  18 June 2026 · Prairie Protection Colorado · $200 – $299 · 25K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• 𝐕𝐎𝐓𝐄 𝐍𝐎 𝐎𝐍 𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝟖𝟑. Hunting and fishing stay legal if this fails. The problem is the wording it puts into the Constitution. “Traditional methods” is not defined. “Preferred means” elevates hunting and fishing above other tools. Those phrases can be used to challenge existing protections in court, and public funds will pay to defend them. A constitutional amendment should be clear. This one leaves Colorado’s wildlife rules open to expensive lawsuits and a judge’s inter

  21 October 2026 · Prairie Protection Colorado · $100 – $199 · 10K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• Cruelty doesn’t become conservation because you call it “tradition.” Colorado’s Constitution should protect our future not give the past a permanent foothold. Vote NO on 83. A killing method is not a constitutional value. @followers #wildlifeconservation #ProtectWildlife

  15 October 2026 · Prairie Protection Colorado · $100 – $199 · 15K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐍𝐎 𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝟖𝟑. On November 3, Colorado voters will see an amendment that would put a constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife “𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐬” into the state constitution. “Traditional methods” is not defined anywhere in the ballot language. Proponents kept that phrase vague. That is the problem. Colorado voters already banned steel-jawed leghold traps, body-crushing traps, snares, and poisons on public land in 1996. In 1

  3 October 2026 · Prairie Protection Colorado · $100 – $199 · 10K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

• 📣 “Right to Hunt” initiative sounds harmless… but it’s a serious threat to our wildlife protections. This measure is packed with vague, undefined phrases like “traditional methods” and “preferred means.” Sounds innocent, right? It’s not. Those fuzzy words are designed to clash with Colorado’s existing ban on cruel body-gripping traps (Amendment 14). Out-of-state groups pushing this know exactly what they’re doing. The ambiguity isn’t an accident; it’s the strategy. If it passes, expect immedi

  26 June 2026 · Prairie Protection Colorado · $100 – $199 · 9K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library