United States 2026 · Every advertiser

NO on the So-Called Wealth Tax

This page ran 3 paid political ads on Facebook and Instagram between 16 June 2026 and 25 June 2026. Meta reports $500 – $797 of spend, which makes it the 15,562nd largest advertiser of the 24,034 pages in our data. Advertiser type: Group or campaign. Most of its spend took no side. Race: Ballot measures. Paid for by Stop the Squeeze.

Data from the Meta Ad Library, pulled 4 November 2026. Election on 3 November 2026. · Every ad of this page in Meta’s Ad Library ↗

On the FEC record

STOP THE SQUEEZE, a super PAC (independent expenditures only). FEC committee C00932806 ↗

A registered committee with no independent expenditures and no party on its registration: the FEC record does not place it, and the side above is our model’s reading of the ads.

3

ads

$649

reported spend, range $500 – $797

0.0%

of spend on federal races

$250

median spend per ad

Meta and Google side by side

On MetaFacebook · Instagram

$649

3 ads on 1 page, midpoint of Meta’s ranges, 4 May 2026 to 31 October 2026

Largest page
NO on the So-Called Wealth Tax · $649
Federal races
0.0%
Median spend per ad
$250
Attack ads, of text ads
100%

Ad Library

On Google and YouTubeSearch · YouTube · Display

$0 – $100

1 ad from 1 verified advertiser account, Google’s ranges, 4 May 2026 to 26 June 2026

Against Meta spend
0.1×
Formats
1 text
Impressions
0–1K
Targeting declared
no age or gender
States named
California
Last ad shown
26 Jun

Google Ads Transparency Center

Google advertiser accounts

AdvertiserAdsFormatsStatesFirst adLast adSpend
Stop the Squeeze11 textCA19 Jun26 Jun$0 – $100

Google publishes no ad text; the link on each account opens its ads in Google’s Ads Transparency Center. An account is tied to this page by its FEC committee; a party page lists its 1 largest.

Spend by week the ad started

6 Jul
3 Aug
7 Sep
5 Oct
 Spend still counting
2 Nov

Tone

Attack
100%

Share of the 3 ads with text that our model classified. Attack ads name an opponent.

Topics

Economy & cost of living
100%
Education
33%
Health
33%

Spend by race: Ballot measures 100%.

Spend by ad language: English 100%.

The costliest ads

The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.

  • The so-called "Wealth Tax" ballot measure provides NO revenue to CA’s general fund to address affordability, homelessness, or education. It is opposed by Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, California Teachers Association, Governor Gavin Newsom, California Chamber of Commerce, and gubernatorial candidates Xavier Becerra and Steve Hilton.

    16 June 2026 · NO on the So-Called Wealth Tax · $300 – $399 · 80K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

  • The independent, non-partisan CA Legislative Analyst’s Office argues that the so-called “Wealth Tax” would result in a “likely ongoing decrease in state income tax revenues”—costing our state hundreds of millions of dollars or more per year.

    25 June 2026 · NO on the So-Called Wealth Tax · $200 – $299 · 20K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

Figures cover domestic political ads paid in dollars, from 4 May 2026. Spend is the sum of Meta’s range midpoints; impressions above one million are reported as “1M+”, so impression figures are floors. Each ad counts in the week its delivery started, with its lifetime spend at our last pull; ads still running before the vote are counted as of 31 October 2026.

Back to the United States report, both parties and every candidate or every advertiser.

NO on the So-Called Wealth Tax: political ads on Facebook and Instagram before the 2026 US midterms · Vipima