United States 2026 · Every advertiser

No on I - Protect Medicaid Expansion

This page ran 3 paid political ads on Facebook and Instagram between 8 October 2026 and 8 October 2026. Meta reports $500 – $797 of spend, which makes it the 15,545th largest advertiser of the 24,034 pages in our data. Advertiser type: Group or campaign. Most of its spend took no side. Race: Ballot measures.

Data from the Meta Ad Library, pulled 4 November 2026. Election on 3 November 2026. · Every ad of this page in Meta’s Ad Library ↗

3

ads

$649

reported spend, range $500 – $797

0.0%

of spend on federal races

$150

median spend per ad

Spend by week the ad started

5 Oct
 Spend still counting
2 Nov

Tone

Attack
100%

Share of the 1 ads with text that our model classified. Attack ads name an opponent.

Topics

Health
100%

Spend by race: Ballot measures 100%.

Spend by ad language: English 23%.

The costliest ads

The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.

  • Vote no on Amendment I.

    8 October 2026 · No on I - Protect Medicaid Expansion · $400 – $499 · 25K+ impressions · Ad Library

  • Let's not make it harder than it already is.

    8 October 2026 · No on I - Protect Medicaid Expansion · $100 – $199 · 10K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

Figures cover domestic political ads paid in dollars, from 4 May 2026. Spend is the sum of Meta’s range midpoints; impressions above one million are reported as “1M+”, so impression figures are floors. Each ad counts in the week its delivery started, with its lifetime spend at our last pull; ads still running before the vote are counted as of 31 October 2026.

Back to the United States report, both parties and every candidate or every advertiser.

No on I - Protect Medicaid Expansion: political ads on Facebook and Instagram before the 2026 US midterms · Vipima