United States 2026 · Every advertiser
NO on AB 2564 - Protect California Discounts
This page ran 28 paid political ads on Facebook and Instagram between 8 July 2026 and 18 August 2026. Meta reports $19.8–26.2K of spend, which makes it the 2,361st largest advertiser of the 24,034 pages in our data. Advertiser type: Group or campaign. Most of its spend took no side. Race: No specific race. Paid for by California Retailers Association.
Data from the Meta Ad Library, pulled 4 November 2026. Election on 3 November 2026. · Every ad of this page in Meta’s Ad Library ↗
28
ads
$23K
reported spend, range $19.8–26.2K
0.0%
of spend on federal races
$500
median spend per ad
Spend by week the ad started
Tone
Share of the 28 ads with text that our model classified. Attack ads name an opponent.
Topics
Spend by race: State 21%, No specific race 79%.
Spend by ad language: English 100%.
The costliest ads
The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.
Californians are already struggling with affordability. Now, AB 2564 threatens to decide which discounts you can have and put rewards programs that families rely on to save at risk. Protect discounts for California consumers. Vote No on AB 2564.
24 July 2026 · NO on AB 2564 - Protect California Discounts · $2–2.5K · 175K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Every dollar matters. AB 2564 could jeopardize the loyalty programs, coupons, and rewards that Californians rely on to save. Legislators, vote NO on AB 2564.
24 July 2026 · NO on AB 2564 - Protect California Discounts · $1.5–2K · 150K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Figures cover domestic political ads paid in dollars, from 4 May 2026. Spend is the sum of Meta’s range midpoints; impressions above one million are reported as “1M+”, so impression figures are floors. Each ad counts in the week its delivery started, with its lifetime spend at our last pull; ads still running before the vote are counted as of 31 October 2026.
Back to the United States report, both parties and every candidate or every advertiser.