United States 2026 · Every advertiser
Martino Law
This page ran 1 paid political ads on Facebook and Instagram between 1 May 2026 and 1 May 2026. Meta reports $0 – $99 of spend, which makes it the 24,004th largest advertiser of the 24,034 pages in our data. Advertiser type: Unidentified. Most of its spend took no side. Race: No specific race.
Data from the Meta Ad Library, pulled 4 November 2026. Election on 3 November 2026. · Every ad of this page in Meta’s Ad Library ↗
1
ads
$50
reported spend, range $0 – $99
0.0%
of spend on federal races
$50
median spend per ad
Spend by week the ad started
Tone
Share of the 1 ads with text that our model classified. Attack ads name an opponent.
Topics
Spend by race: No specific race 100%.
Spend by ad language: English 100%.
The costliest ads
The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.
The Supreme Court ruled on a case that quietly reshapes how the Voting Rights Act works. The headline version: a 6-3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais. The Court did not strike down the Voting Rights Act. It did not even overrule the major precedents. What it did was rebuild the framework that voting-rights plaintiffs use, in three small but consequential ways. The new test is, in practice, almost impossible to satisfy in the Deep South, where most Section 2 redistricting cases come from. If yo
1 May 2026 · Martino Law · $0 – $99 · 4K+ impressions · Informational · Ad Library
Figures cover domestic political ads paid in dollars, from 4 May 2026. Spend is the sum of Meta’s range midpoints; impressions above one million are reported as “1M+”, so impression figures are floors. Each ad counts in the week its delivery started, with its lifetime spend at our last pull; ads still running before the vote are counted as of 31 October 2026.
Back to the United States report, both parties and every candidate or every advertiser.