Hunters and Anglers Against 83

This page ran 14 paid political ads on Facebook and Instagram between 20 October 2026 and 24 October 2026. Meta reports $7.2–10.2K of spend, which makes it the 4,656th largest advertiser of the 24,034 pages in our data. Advertiser type: Group or campaign. Most of its spend took no side. Race: Ballot measures.

Data from the Meta Ad Library, pulled 4 November 2026. Election on 3 November 2026. · Every ad of this page in Meta’s Ad Library ↗

ads

$8.7K

reported spend, range $7.2–10.2K

0.0%

of spend on federal races

$200

median spend per ad

Spend by week the ad started

Spend still counting

2 Nov

Tone

Attack

100%

Share of the 14 ads with text that our model classified. Attack ads name an opponent.

Most attacked

pro-83 crowd$1.5K

Targets as the ads name them, by spend; the spellings of Donald Trump are counted together, other names as written.

Topics

Security, crime & immigration

57%

Infrastructure & energy

43%

Corruption & governance

29%

Electoral process & turnout

21%

Spend by race: Ballot measures 100%.

Spend by ad language: English 100%.

The costliest ads

The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.

Vote no Amendment 83. We oppose the proposed so-called "Right to Hunt Amendment" as it paves the way to bring back cruel hunting and trapping practices that have been banned by voters in our state for decades. Hunting and fishing are legal, and we don't need vague language that will only create lawsuits locked in our Constitution. Paid for by Colorado Hunters and Anglers for Sensible Wildlife Conservation.
24 October 2026 · Hunters and Anglers Against 83 · $2–2.5K · 60K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Vote No Amendment 83. This so-called "Right to Hunt Amendment" paves the way to bring back cruel hunting and trapping practices that have been banned by voters in our state for decades. Paid for Colorado Hunters and Anglers for Sensible Wildlife Conservation.
24 October 2026 · Hunters and Anglers Against 83 · $2–2.5K · 100K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Before you vote, read the fine print. This isn't about hunting; Amendment 83's vague language is designed to lock you out of decision-making, create a foundation for a ton of lawsuits that will fall back on taxpayers, and pave the way to bring back cruel hunting and trapping practices that have been banned by voters in our state for decades. Don't be fooled. Paid for by Colorado Hunters and Anglers for Sensible Wildlife Conservation.
24 October 2026 · Hunters and Anglers Against 83 · $1–1.5K · 50K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
We hear a lot of demeaning labels from the pro-83 crowd directed at the non-hunting community. They call non-hunters “anti’s” and “woke” among a host of other derogatory names. Let’s talk for a minute about a more enlightened view of wildlife stakeholders and who should have a voice and seat at the table: We recognize and appreciate the over $2.5 BILLION of economic contributions that wildlife watching brings to Colorado. We welcome the input and contributions of SCIENTISTS from our lead
24 October 2026 · Hunters and Anglers Against 83 · $1–1.5K · 70K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library

Figures cover domestic political ads paid in dollars, from 4 May 2026. Spend is the sum of Meta’s range midpoints; impressions above one million are reported as “1M+”, so impression figures are floors. Each ad counts in the week its delivery started, with its lifetime spend at our last pull; ads still running before the vote are counted as of 31 October 2026.

Back to the United States report, both parties and every candidate or every advertiser.