United States 2026 · Every advertiser
Bend the Curve
This page ran 37 paid political ads on Facebook and Instagram between 28 May 2026 and 14 August 2026. Meta reports $15.3–21.5K of spend, which makes it the 2,779th largest advertiser of the 24,034 pages in our data. Advertiser type: Group or campaign. Most of its spend took no side. Race: No specific race.
Data from the Meta Ad Library, pulled 4 November 2026. Election on 3 November 2026. · Every ad of this page in Meta’s Ad Library ↗
37
ads
$18.4K
reported spend, range $15.3–21.5K
0.0%
of spend on federal races
$50
median spend per ad
Spend by week the ad started
Tone
Share of the 37 ads with text that our model classified. Attack ads name an opponent.
Most attacked
- Whirlpool$15.4K
- KitchenAid$545
Targets as the ads name them, by spend; the spellings of Donald Trump are counted together, other names as written.
Topics
Spend by race: No specific race 100%.
Spend by ad language: English 100%.
The costliest ads
The highest-spend ad of each distinct text, as it ran.
Some Whirpool products, like the popular KitchenAid stand mixer, use styrofoam packaging. Made from polystyrene plastic, a material that hides a dirty secret. This plastic foam can pose health risks throughout its lifecycle. Early on, the chemical plants emit cancer-causing air pollutants. Later, the styrofoam ends up in landfills. It can't realistically be recycled at scale. It’s time for Whirlpool to make a change.
29 May 2026 · Bend the Curve · $7–8K · 200K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
If other appliance brands can move away from plastic foam, why hasn’t Whirlpool? Safer options for our planet already exist: molded fiber, corrugated cardboard, and bio-based foam. Yet many of Whirlpool’s KitchenAid brand products still arrive packed in EPS plastic foam. Tell Whirlpool: no more excuses. Phase out plastic foam packaging.
8 July 2026 · Bend the Curve · $2–2.5K · 70K+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
What’s so bad about Whirlpool’s styrofoam packaging? 🏭 Chemical plants emit air pollutants linked to cancer 🚮 It’s not realistically recyclable at scale ♻ Safer alternatives exist
29 May 2026 · Bend the Curve · $1–1.5K · 25K+ impressions · Informational · Ad Library
There’s a reason cities and towns across the country don’t let you put styrofoam in your recycling bin: it can’t be recycled at scale. That’s why KitchenAid needs to make the switch to more sustainable packaging. Otherwise, styrofoam will continue piling up in our landfills, communities, and vulnerable ecosystems.
14 August 2026 · Bend the Curve · $0 – $99 · 100+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
KitchenAid’s use of styrofoam packaging is completely unnecessary when safer alternatives exist. The outdated packaging has a toxic lifecycle that can put local communities at risk. Click the link to send a letter to Whirlpool, KitchenAid’s parent company.
14 August 2026 · Bend the Curve · $0 – $99 · 100+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Everyone loves their KitchenAid stand mixer. But, right now, it comes with a steep cost. The styrofoam in the box can pose health concerns across its lifecycle—from hazardous air pollution, including chemicals linked to cancer, to the disposal of most of this packaging in landfills. It simply isn't sustainable. The good news? Safer alternatives exist. Other companies already use them. KitchenAid can too.
8 July 2026 · Bend the Curve · $0 – $99 · 100+ impressions · Attack · Ad Library
Figures cover domestic political ads paid in dollars, from 4 May 2026. Spend is the sum of Meta’s range midpoints; impressions above one million are reported as “1M+”, so impression figures are floors. Each ad counts in the week its delivery started, with its lifetime spend at our last pull; ads still running before the vote are counted as of 31 October 2026.
Back to the United States report, both parties and every candidate or every advertiser.